ログインすると、以下の機能が利用できます（要慶應ID）。
- 検索条件に所属情報（学部、学科・専攻、学年等）がセットされる（新入生は入学後に利用可能）
- お気に入り（ブックマーク）
- シラバス詳細の表示
現代東南アジア論Ⅰ（地）
| サブタイトル | Cold War in Southeast Asia |
|---|---|
| 担当者名 | 山本 信人 |
| 単位 | 2 |
| 年度・学期 | 2026 春 |
| 曜日時限 | 水2 |
| キャンパス | 三田 |
| 授業実施形態 | 対面授業（主として対面授業） |
| 登録番号 | 34537 |
| 設置学部・研究科 | 法学部 |
| 設置学科・専攻 | 政治学科 |
| 学年 | 3, 4 |
| 分野 | 政治学科目選択・系列科目地域研究・比較政治論 |
| 評語タイプ | ログインすると表示されます（要慶應ID）。 |
| 科目概要 | This lecture historicizes the Cold War in Southeast Asia. |
| K-Number | FLP-PS-34253-212-86 |
| 科目設置 | 学部・研究科 | FLP | 法学部 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 学科・専攻 | PS | 政治学科 | |
| 科目主番号 | レベル | 3 | 3年次配当レベル |
| 大分類 | 4 | 専門科目 | |
| 小分類 | 25 | 展開 - 地域研究・比較政治 | |
| 科目種別 | 3 | 選択科目 | |
| 科目補足 | 授業区分 | 2 | 講義 |
| 授業実施形態 | 1 | 対面授業（主として対面授業） | |
| 授業言語 | 2 | 英語 | |
| 学問分野 | 86 | 総合・複合領域（社会科学系） | |
授業科目の内容・目的・方法・到達目標
In Southeast Asia, Cold War dynamics significantly influenced national policies across various aspects, and Cold War mentalities continue to manifest in public discourse. By historicizing the Cold War in Southeast Asia, this lecture examines not only the history of the regional Cold War as a whole but also highlights critical events and developments that shaped and altered its course.
The global power competition of the Cold War constructed “regions” in many parts of the world. Conventional wisdom shows that Southeast Asia is no exception and is, in fact, a typical Cold War creation. Southeast Asia was an artificial construct that originated from British military strategy to defend its colonies and their neighbors against Japan’s military occupation. After WWII, the US gradually assumed a hegemonic position in the region, taking over from the UK. The concept and reality of Southeast Asia transformed and materialized from the late 1940s onward.
Two points should be briefly addressed. First, it is commonly understood that the Cold War in Southeast Asia was characterized by US-China competition. The establishment of the People’s Republic of China in 1949 shocked the West, which moved quickly to counteract and contain the influence and spread of communism in the region. Indochina became a hotspot, experiencing a sequence of wars that signified a Cold War-type confrontation and had a significant regional impact.
Second, the regional Cold War shaped and regulated domestic politics. This aspect was called the domestic Cold War. Newly independent countries with “liberal democratic” governments historically had communist-related political parties and organizations, and dealing with them became a political and security issue.
Even after the US-China rapprochement in 1972, which logically ended the regional Cold War, Cold War politics continued both nationally and regionally. It has shaped and reconstructed national memories (and national amnesias) of communism and related matters. The Cold War legacies remain noticeable in many parts of the region.
By revisiting the Cold War in Southeast Asia during the 20th century, this lecture aims to delve into and comprehend the complexities and realities of the Cold War experience in Southeast Asia.
The lecture is designed for students interested in Southeast Asian politics, political history, and regional international politics.
The global power competition of the Cold War constructed “regions” in many parts of the world. Conventional wisdom shows that Southeast Asia is no exception and is, in fact, a typical Cold War creation. Southeast Asia was an artificial construct that originated from British military strategy to defend its colonies and their neighbors against Japan’s military occupation. After WWII, the US gradually assumed a hegemonic position in the region, taking over from the UK. The concept and reality of Southeast Asia transformed and materialized from the late 1940s onward.
Two points should be briefly addressed. First, it is commonly understood that the Cold War in Southeast Asia was characterized by US-China competition. The establishment of the People’s Republic of China in 1949 shocked the West, which moved quickly to counteract and contain the influence and spread of communism in the region. Indochina became a hotspot, experiencing a sequence of wars that signified a Cold War-type confrontation and had a significant regional impact.
Second, the regional Cold War shaped and regulated domestic politics. This aspect was called the domestic Cold War. Newly independent countries with “liberal democratic” governments historically had communist-related political parties and organizations, and dealing with them became a political and security issue.
Even after the US-China rapprochement in 1972, which logically ended the regional Cold War, Cold War politics continued both nationally and regionally. It has shaped and reconstructed national memories (and national amnesias) of communism and related matters. The Cold War legacies remain noticeable in many parts of the region.
By revisiting the Cold War in Southeast Asia during the 20th century, this lecture aims to delve into and comprehend the complexities and realities of the Cold War experience in Southeast Asia.
The lecture is designed for students interested in Southeast Asian politics, political history, and regional international politics.
実務経験のある教員による授業科目
該当しない
能動的学修形式説明
ディスカッション、ディベート
準備学修（予習・復習等）
Approximately one hour per week is needed for reviewing the lessons
授業の計画
第1回
Introduction
第2回
Regional Cold War
第3回
Comintern’s Shadow
第4回
Wartime
第5回
Decolonization
第6回
1948
第7回
Mid-term exam
第8回
Othering China
第9回
Developmental Authoritarianism
第10回
Indonesia’s Crisis
第11回
East Timor’s Crisis
第12回
Indochinese Refugee Crisis
第13回
Inconvenient Truths
第14回
Final Examination: In-class and Closed-book
その他
Wrap-up
成績評価方法
Mid-term exam (30%) and Final exam (70%)
授業における生成AIの利用可否・利用方針
Students may use AI tools for search purposes.
担当教員から履修者へのコメント
ログインすると表示されます（要慶應ID）。
質問・相談
ログインすると表示されます（要慶應ID）。